Hi, getting visibility among core literary public is benchmark
of publishing success and this message is part of an aggressive online campaign
for the promotion and visibility of my two books [1] Political Internet and [2] Intimate Speakers among core reading public in
online space.
It will be really helpful if you are able
to help me forward, share, tweet, post, or tag this message or parts of this
message among potential
beneficiaries of the ideas in the books in your network, your friend’s
network or their networks?
Or anyone should according to you
benefit if they work broadly on anything related to social media, Internet,
society, politics, cyber sexuality, Internet pornography, intimacies,
women and online misogyny, introverts, underprivileged people, Diaspora,
cyberspace, Internet in education, International relations, digital politics,
social media and state, public sphere, civil society, social capital,
contentious politics and so on.
Buy it on Amazon:
Preview on Google Play:
Preview on Google Books:
Preview on Kindle:
Publisher Website:
2. Intimate Speakers: Why Introverted and Socially Ostracized Citizens
Use Social Media, (Fingerprint! 2017).
Buy it on Amazon:
Flipkart:
Blog Review:
goodreadsreviews:
Contact the author
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/bijugayu
Twitter: https://twitter.com/bijugayu
Blogger: http://bijugayu.blogspot.in/
LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/biju-gayu...
WordPress: https://bijugayu.wordpress.com/
Tumblr: http://bijugayu.tumblr.com/
Google +: https://plus.google.com/1020267030393...
Twitter: https://twitter.com/b
Blogger: http://bijugayu.blogs
LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin
WordPress: https://bijugayu.wo
Tumblr: http://bijugayu.tumblr
Google +: https://plus.google.com/102
Biju
P R
Author,
Teacher, Blogger
Assistant
Professor of Political Science
Government
Brennen College
Thalassery
Kerala,
India
My Books
1. Political Internet: State and Politics in the Age of Social Media,
(Routledge 2017), Amazon https://www.amazon.in/Political-InternetStatePoliticsSocialebook/dp/B01M5K3SCU?_encoding=UTF8&qid=&ref_=tmm_kin_swatch_0&sr=

2. Intimate Speakers: Why Introverted and Socially Ostracized Citizens Use Social Media, (Fingerprint! 2017)
Amazon: http://www.amazon.in/dp/8175994290/ref=sr_1_2?s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=1487261127&sr=1-2&keywords=biju+p+r

1. Political Internet: State and Politics in the Age of Social Media,
(Routledge 2017), Amazon https://www.amazon.in/
2. Intimate Speakers: Why Introverted and Socially Ostracized Citizens Use Social Media, (Fingerprint! 2017)
Amazon: http://www.amazon.in/dp/
Role of
IMF
The
International Monetary Fund is a global organisation founded in 1944. It aims
was to help stabilise exchange rates and provide loans to countries in need.
Nearly all members of the United Nations are members of the IMF with a few
exceptions such as Cuba, Lichtenstein and Andorra. The IMF is independent of
the World Bank although both are United Nations agencies and both are aiming to
increase living standards. The World Bank concentrates on long term loans to
developing countries.
Functions of IMF
- International Monetary Cooperation
- Promote exchange Rate stability
- To help deal with Balance of Payments adjustment
- Help Deal With Economic Crisis by providing international coordination
What
the IMF does
1. Economic Surveillance. IMF produces reports on member countries’ economies and suggest areas
of weakness / possible danger. The idea is to work on crisis prevention by
highlighting areas of economic imbalance.
2. Loans to Country’s with financial crisis. The IMF has
$300 billion of loanable funds. This comes from member countries who deposit a
certain amount on joining. In times of financial / economic crisis, the IMF may
be willing to make available loans as part of a financial readjustment. The IMF has arranged
more than $180 billion in bailout packages since 1997.
3. Technical assistance and economic training. The IMF
produce many reports and publications. They can also offer support for local
economies.
How is IMF Financed?
The IMF is financed by member
countries who contribute funds on joining. They can also increase this
throughout their membership. The IMF can also ask its member countries for more
money. IMF financial resources have risen from about $50 billion in 1950 to
nearly $300 billion last year, sourced from contributions from its 183 members.
This initial amount depends on the size of the countries economy. E.g. the US
deposited the largest amount with the IMF. The US currently has 16% of voting
rights at the IMF, a reflection of its quotas deposited with IMF. The UK has 4%
of IMF Voting rights. Loans are also available to developing countries to ‘deal
with poverty reduction.’
Special Drawing Rights SDR
The IMF use Special drawing
rights to provide a unit for the amount of foreign currency member states can
draw on. SDRs are defined in terms of a basket of major currencies including:
Euro, Pound Sterling, Japanese yen and US Dollar.
Criticism of
IMF
Over time, the IMF has been subject to a range
of criticisms, generally focused on the conditions of its loans. The IMF has
also been criticised for its lack of accountability and willingness to lend to
country’s with bad human rights record.Many Criticisms of IMF include:
1. Conditions of Loans
On giving loans to countries,
the IMF makes the loan conditional on the implementation of certain economic
policies. These policies tend to involve:
1.Reducing
government borrowing – Higher taxes and lower spending
2.Higher
interest rates to stabilise the currency.
3.Allow
failing firms to go bankrupt.
4.Structural
adjustment. Privatisation, deregulation, reducing corruption and bureaucracy.
The problem is that these
policies of structural adjustment and macroeconomic intervention make the
situation worse.
For example, in the Asian crisis of
1997, many
countries such as Indonesia, Malaysia and Thailand were required by IMF to
pursue tight monetary policy (higher interest rates) and tight fiscal policy to
reduce the budget deficit and strengthen exchange rates. However, these
policies caused a minor slowdown to turn into a serious recession with mass
unemployment.
In 2001, Argentina was forced
into a similar policy of fiscal restraint. This led to a decline in investment
in public services which arguably damaged the economy.
2.
Exchange Rate Reforms.
When the IMF intervened in Kenya in the 1990s, they made the Central bank
remove controls over flows of capital. The consensus was that this decision
made it easier for corrupt politicians to transfer money out of the economy
(known as the Goldman scandal). Critics argue this is another example of how
the IMF failed to understand the dynamics of the country that they were dealing
with – insisting on blanket reforms.
The
economist Joseph Stiglitz has criticised the more monetarist approach of the
IMF in recent years. He argues it is failing to take the best policy to improve
the welfare of developing countries saying the IMF "was not participating
in a conspiracy, but it was reflecting the interests and ideology of the
Western financial community."
3.
Devaluations
In earlier days, the IMF have been criticised for allowing inflationary
devaluations.
4.
Neo Liberal Criticisms
There is also criticism of neo liberal policies such as privatisation. Arguably
these free market policies were not always suitable for the situation of the
country. For example, privatisation can create lead to the creation of private
monopolies who exploit consumers.
5.
Free Market Criticisms of IMF
As
well as being criticised for implementing ‘free market reforms’ Other critise
the IMF for being too interventionist. Believers in free markets argue that it
is better to let capital markets operate without attempts at intervention. They
argue attempts to influence exchange rates only make things worse – it is
better to allow currencies to reach their market level.
There
is also a criticism that bailout countries with large debt creates moral
hazard. Because of the possibility of getting bailed out it encourages people
to borrow more.
6. Lack of Transparency and
involvement
The
IMF have been criticised for imposing policy with little or no consultation
with affected countries.
Jeffrey
Sachs, the head of the Harvard Institute for International Development said:
"In
Korea the IMF insisted that all presidential candidates immediately
"endorse" an agreement which they had no part in drafting or
negotiating, and no time to understand. The situation is out of hand…It defies
logic to believe the small group of 1,000 economists on 19th Street in
Washington should dictate the economic conditions of life to 75 developing
countries with around 1.4 billion people."
7.
Supporting Military dictatorships.
The
IMF have been criticised for supporting military dictatorships in Brazil and
Argentina, such as Castello Branco in 1960s received IMF funds denied to other
countries.
No comments:
Post a Comment